Unfortunately, I can´t prove it but this might be the reason for
non-archiving issues:
For the last times I posted with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" which is
basically the same as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with one
difference:
- I am subscribed with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
- asta.uni-wuppertal.de is allowed, too
- there is no DNS-entry for asta.uni-wuppertal.de (we can't change it)
Apart from these details the recent message with "...wflin3..." in it *has*
been archived.
If the archiving code has not been changed from 2.01 up to 2.02: does it is
possible that *non*-Subscribers are not archived (different in Beta 6)?
If this was true there was an important issue to us because we *have to*
archive non-members messages archiving an external Mailinglist for internal
use (filtering Bcc messages).
Any ideas about that?!
Thanks in advance,
Steffen
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
