>>>>> "BW" == Bill Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But, Mailman could do a better job of conforming to RFC 2369.
>> E.g. it could suppress List-Post: for read-only lists,
BW> Or, as Chuq mentioned use the List-Post: NO syntax.
That's what I meant to say. :)
>> Whether that means adding for Mailman 2.1 a list-specific
>> configuration option (-1) or a site-wide configuration variable
>> (-0), I'm not sure.
BW> Thank-you, Barry, for reconsidering this issue. Please cast
BW> my vote for a per-list option for the reasons outline in my
BW> message to JC.
Noted. Thanks.
-Barry
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? J C Lawrence
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Nigel Metheringham
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Mike Noyes
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Thomas Hillson
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? J C Lawrence
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Barry A. Warsaw
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bob Puff @ NLE
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? "J�rgen A. Erhard"
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Dan Lowe
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Dan Mick
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Bill Warner
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Thomas Hillson
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: remove this? Dan Wilder
