Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> I recommend anybody running any version of
> Mailman 2.0.x to upgrade to 2.0.9, the latest stable release.
The htdig patch by Richard Barrett is not compatible with the new
version of Mailman. Are there plans for a new revision of this patch?
I enclose the output from applying the patch in Mailman 2.0.9.
Best
Kaja
~/sources/mailman-2.0.9> patch --dry-run -p1 < htdig-2.0.8-0.1.patch
patching file INSTALL
patching file INSTALL.htdig-mm
patching file Mailman/Archiver/HyperArch.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 39.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 515 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 558 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 682 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 708 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #6 FAILED at 763.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 762 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 802 (offset -3 lines).
2 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Archiver/HyperArch.py.rej
patching file Mailman/Cgi/htdig.py
patching file Mailman/Cgi/updateTOC.py
patching file Mailman/Defaults.py.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 552.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Defaults.py.in.rej
patching file Makefile.in
patching file bin/Makefile.in
patching file bin/blow_away_htdig
patching file cron/Makefile.in
patching file cron/crontab.in.in
patching file cron/nightly_htdig
patching file cron/remote_nightly_htdig
patching file cron/remote_nightly_htdig.pl
patching file cron/remote_nightly_htdig_noshare
patching file src/Makefile.in
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
