Surely I'm missing something obvious (as usual), but this one has me stumped. A list owner requested I eliminate his current archives so he can begin anew for the quarter. I did this, as I have a few other times in the past, using the guidelines in the FAQ:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.003.htp In short, I deleted the /$HOME/archives/private/listname directory, erased the listname.mbox/listname.mbox and re archived. No problem, this works as always and the list is now accepting archived anew as intended. The problem is that the list owner pointed out that doing this seems to have eliminated the option to "download the full raw archive" which he uses regularly. I am stumped as to why. I looked at a couple other lists on which I've performed this action in the past, and see that the same result has occured. Is it safe to just add this link in the archive index.html? Or is it going to be overwritten again when /bin/arch is next exectuted? And is there a way to perform this archive housekeeping that prevents this from happening? -- warren woodward XMission DSL Domo/Mailman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (801) 303-0819 (877) XMISSION ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/