-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:36:51 -0800 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Chavez wrote: >> >>Not sure how to get at the number of "avoided duplicates," though. >>Could you elaborate? > > If a regular member's options include "nodupes" and the member's > address is in a To: or Cc: header of the post, Mailman will not send > the post to that member. Here's where this gets interesting. ;-) I myself subscribe to this list, have the nodupes bit set, and see "Receive your own posts to the list? Yes" in my configuration page. I receive copies of my own posts. Would that be because I'm the owner? The other subscriber *also* has the nodupes bit, also sees "Receive your own posts to the list? Yes" in his configuration page. He *doesn't* receive copies of his own posts, yet everyone else does. > This does not seem to come into play here as > the number of regular members is 58 and the number of smtp recipients > is also 58, thus we don't have to account for any "missing" > recipients. If we did have to account for missing recipients, we would > have to see if any regular members were in To: or Cc: headers before > concluding there was a problem. This is what I meant by "minus the > number of "avoided duplicates"". Understood, thanks. > In your case, it is simpler. There are 58 regular members, all of whom > are receiving mail and mailman claims to have sent the post to 58 > recipients. So far, so good. Actually, I re-analyzed the logs just now and it turns out that there had been an unsubscription between the time that this message was relayed and the time that I ran list_members. Therefore, the recipient count should be considered to be 57, which accounts for the fact that his post wasn't sent back to him. >>Nevertheless, tracing through the Postfix log for that particular post >>also yields 58 recipients. This strikes me as very odd since the sender >>is a non-digest subscriber. > > It seems to agree with Mailman that there were the expected 58 > recipients, thus the issue seems to be on the outbound side of Postfix. Possibly, but I can't help but thinking that the problem lies in Mailman-space, since Postfix would at least record an attempt, yes? >>Thanks for your assistance. Any further thoughts as to what could be >>causing this? > > You could look at Mailman's bounce log to see if anything bounced for > this member, but presumably you would have already seen it in the > Postfix log if it had. No bounce recorded. > Perhaps the member has a filter at his end that treats the message > differently if it is From: him. Perhaps some kind of spam rule that > assumes a message From: him that is not explicitly addressed (To: or > Cc:) to him is SPAM. Highly doubtful, since the message is not getting past my MTA. ;-) Thanks again. - -- Anthony Chavez http://anthonychavez.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBukiAbZTbIaRBRXERAg5cAJwIsvmd1F6B1j1xzf2G6qPVNzcgYACgg3lG 044jvtxrIJ1ZrDFC8MwPiz8= =5eiG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/