Tim Faircloth wrote >At 02:23 PM 1/14/2005, you wrote: > >>What does the rejection notice say? > >email address has been changed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to protect the >(seemingly) innocent. > >>You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has >>been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are >>being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Received: from canes.gsw.edu (canes.GSW.edu [x.x.x.x]) >> by radar.gsw.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j0EH0Oc16092 >> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:00:24 -0500 (EST) >>Received: from xxxxx.canes.gsw.edu ([x.x.x.x]) >> by canes.gsw.edu (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j0EH0OF19777 >> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:00:24 -0500 (EST) >>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 >>Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:03:38 -0500 >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>From: Joe User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Library Additions list for Nov-Dec 2004 >>Mime-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; >> boundary="=====================_13333125==_.ALT" >>X-radar.gsw.edu-MailScanner-Information: Contact GSW OIIT for more information >>X-radar.gsw.edu-MailScanner: Found to be clean >>X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Anything interesting in the Mailman logs, post and vette in particular? > >Not really... just some stuff in post: > >post:Jan 14 09:19:56 2005 (304) post to facstaff from >[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=2125, >message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success >post:Jan 14 12:00:29 2005 (304) post to facstaff from >[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3139, >message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success > >The strange thing is that on the first post she made (at 9:19am), she >didn't get a reject notice at all...
There are some clues here, but nothing definitive. The reject notice comes from Mailman/Handlers/Moderate.py do_reject. do_reject is only called if the poster is a non-member and is either in reject_these_nonmembers or is in none of the *_these_nonmembers and generic_nonmember_action is Reject. The big clue is the listowner in this case is [EMAIL PROTECTED] indicating the post is being considered for the mailman list, not for the facstaff list. So it seems that posting to the facstaff list is working except that some of the time the post is also being considered for the mailman list too and being rejected there. The fact that it doesn't happen every time may rule out things like alias problems, but if you could obtain copies of the two posts from 09:19 and 12:00 you might be able to see some header differences that could account for this. Also, looking at all the Mailman logs from these time periods may reveal differences between the two cases. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
