Jost Krieger wrote: > >My idea would be to restructure the options in the following way: > >DEFAULT_REPLY_GOES_TO_LIST: ># 0 - Reply-To: no address ># 1 - Reply-To: back to the list ># 2 - Reply-To: to an explicit value (reply_to_address) ># 3 - Reply-To: to sender of mail > >DEFAULT_FIRST_STRIP_REPLY_TO ># 0 - merge ># 1 - override ># 2 - respect > >For our case, I'd use values of "0" and "2".
Would you really? How would that be different from the current reply_goes_to_list = Poster and first_strip_reply_to = No I think I can understand your idea if you would use values of 1 and 2, but it wouldn't work because of all the MUAs that unconditionally put Reply-To: in the message when it's not different from From: -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
