Brad Knowles wrote: >At 8:17 AM -0400 2005-09-01, Tom Limoncelli wrote: > >> Would it be worth it to do a "mailmanctl" every 49 weeks as a preventive >> measure? Is there a recommended way to automate this? I'm concerned >> that I might not remember to do it in July 2006. I might be traveling then. >> >> Is this a common problem with mailman? Should I be concerned? > > Well, it's the first I've heard of such a problem, but I wouldn't >be too surprised that there was some sort of a 48-52 week bug. >
I think there was a report on this list a while back that someone's qrunners died after some time that turned out to be due to his OS killing some processes that ran too long. There might be more info in Mailman's qrunner log to help understand why they quit. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
