Mordechai T. Abzug wrote: > >Yes, the web part and the mail part are easy. My concern is the >mailman configuration itself, as per my earlier posting. I need full >redundancy. Note that performance is NOT a problem. The problem is >to not have a single point of failure. The servers in question are >way-overspec'd for the expected load, but we need to be able to >continue running in the event that we lose a facility.
Having two 'live' mailman instances with separate data and keeping them synched would be very difficult. Another approach which you can find discussed somewhat in the archives of this and/or the mailman-developers list is to have one live installation and a second 'hot spare' installation. Then the problem reduces to just keeping the spare's data current which is more manageable. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
