Jim Popovitch wrote: > >OK, but what about the next one? What do Mailman system admins do, wait?
Yes, I think so. The alternative is everyone goes off half-cocked and you have a situation such as occurred about a year ago with the CAN-2005-0202 issue <http://www.list.org/security.html>. In this case, someone developed a patch which SuSE pushed out through their automatic update process, but the patch was dependent on a part of the Python library that SuSE didn't install by default and the dependency wasn't noted. This caused a lot of grief at the time. See <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Amail.python.org++inurl%3Amailman-users+suse+sax>. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
