The various log entries are: Post: Feb 09 11:25:52 2006 (20476) post to announce from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1924, message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success Feb 09 11:27:42 2006 (11160) post to announce from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1924, message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success Feb 09 11:42:51 2006 (11160) post to announce from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1905, message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success Feb 09 11:54:37 2006 (15456) post to announce from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1924, message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success Feb 09 11:59:47 2006 (15456) post to announce from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1723, message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, success
Corresponding in smtp: Feb 09 11:25:52 2006 (20476) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp for 13 recips, completed in 0.704 seconds Feb 09 11:27:42 2006 (11160) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp for 13 recips, completed in 0.936 seconds Feb 09 11:42:51 2006 (11160) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp for 13 recips, completed in 0.572 seconds Feb 09 11:54:37 2006 (15456) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp for 13 recips, completed in 0.427 seconds Feb 09 11:59:47 2006 (15456) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp for 13 recips, completed in 0.655 seconds And then a few seconds after each one in vette: Feb 09 11:26:05 2006 (20474) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:26:07 2006 (20474) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:26:09 2006 (20474) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:28:05 2006 (11158) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:28:07 2006 (11158) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:28:09 2006 (11158) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:43:05 2006 (11158) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:43:07 2006 (11158) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:43:09 2006 (11158) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:55:06 2006 (15454) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:55:08 2006 (15454) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 11:55:11 2006 (15454) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 12:00:05 2006 (15454) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 12:00:07 2006 (15454) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feb 09 12:00:10 2006 (15454) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It'll take me a bit longer to pull the applicable sendmail and procmail logs. Nothing looks amiss in procmail, though; it matches on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and sends it along to the mailman handler as it should. What I'd really like to see is a snapshot of the actual messages that are being send to the smtp server.. I probably know enough python to hack that in myself, though. I'll look at that on Tuesday. - Patrick Bogen On 2/11/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick Bogen wrote: > > >Post shows my message sent to the list received properly. > > > Actually, 'post' log entries say that the message was not only > 'received' by Mailman, but that it made it all the way through and was > sent out. > > > >SMTP shows > >that it delivered to recipients. (If exact messages would be helpful, > >let me know and I'll grab them from the logs. > > > This means that the outgoing message was successfully passed to and > accepted by the MTA. It is a matter of faith that the recipients of > the message as sent to the MTA are in fact the list members who should > receive it. At this point, it's up to the MTA to deliver it, and if we > accept that the recipient list given to the MTA is correct and doesn't > include the 'announce' address, the only thing that would come back > would be a bounce which should be returned to the announce-bounces > address. > > > >These reports are from > >memory, but I looked at the various logs several times before > >resorting to asking for help. :) > > > Thank you. > > The smtp log entry relating to delivery of a post looks something like > > Feb 11 17:17:09 2006 (1570) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp for 66 > recips, completed in 0.887 seconds. > > The important things are the message-id (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in > this case) and the number of recipients (66 here) equal to the number > of message mode subscribers with delivery enabled minus the sender if > the sender is 'not metoo' and minus any subscribers that are 'nodups' > and mentioned in To: or Cc: of the post. > > The important thing about the message-id of the post is that it not be > of the form <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, because that > indicates a Mailman internally generated message and not a post. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > > -- - Patrick Bogen ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
