On 3/1/06, Greg Lindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't seem that integrating spam detection is very easy, > perhaps it should be made easier? Integrating spam detection into mailman is actually quite easy- once your MTA is configured for it. That is an MTA issue, not a mailman issue. (If you'd like an analogy, this seems akin to complaining to the gas station that your car's gas tank has to be filled from underneath, and you'd like them to fix it)
> Well, let's just say that I found the list to be pretty lame. You made > the only constructive comment, thanks. And to be fair, I consider most of the other comments constructive; it is often better/easier to fix a policy problem than to fix the way that mailman works. In all fairness, your comment about your years of experience was the first rude thing. It doesn't really do to ask for help and then beat us over the head with your qualifications because you don't want to hear the particular suggestions. When you ask for help, you are throwing yourselves on our mercy, as it were- any pride you may have should be long out the window. - Patrick Bogen ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
