Patrick Bogen wrote:
> On 2/28/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>If you really think this is resulting in messages being discarded that
>>shouldn't be, I suggest you remove the KNOWN_SPAMMERS entry from
>>mm_cfg.py and instead, put
>>
>>^X-Spam-Status:\s*Yes
>>
>>in header_filter_rules for some of the problem lists with action Hold.
>
>
> I just got done configuring something very similar, but I was having
> problems. I was originally matching against '^X-Spam-Status: Yes',
> which never matched. Removing the '^' did the trick. I'm not sure why
> this is.
I'll do some research if I get time today but I'm fairly sure something
is borked with this spam filtering. Looking through the code I can see
that if a header is not found its not supposed to return a spam match.
The other thing I've noticed is that owner's don't seem to get spam
scanned. Still, our behaviour was that
KNOWN_SPAMMERS = [('X-Spam-Status','Yes')]
caused all emails from non-owners to be silently discarded.
At this stage I'm following the advice by not using KNOWN_SPAMMERS and
concentrating on per list measures. Thanks for your help.
--
Joel Heenan
Sensory Networks
Ph: +61 2 8322 2744 Fax: +61 2 9475 0316
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
