On 8/24/06 11:11 AM, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:41 AM -0700 2006-08-24, John W. Baxter wrote: > >> Is there any interest in sanitizing the FAQ by adjusting examples to follow >> RFC 2606 as closely as possible? I'm reasonably sure that 2.003 isn't the >> only entry which could use adjustment. > > Sure, that's a great idea. The Mailman FAQ Wizard is a > community-supported facility, and all the information you need for > making updates or creating entire new entries is provided on the > page. In a way, this is kind of like a wiki, although it has a much > simpler syntax, and is a lot easier than most wikis that I've > encountered. > > If you're up for it, please go ahead and make the appropriate changes. OK, thanks. I was volunteering, but didn't want to forge ahead without letting the idea be visible for a while. I'll wait a while longer for a possible "veto". (More to do during my "off duty" hours. Say I, who got nine pages around 03:15 yesterday (local time, unfortunately) from our monitors.) --John ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
