Jon Loose wrote: >Thanks Brad/Mark for comments. It seems outlook is to blame for the message >ids. Re: Security, I will pass back to the list anything I find that's simple >enough for me! The potential feature set of 2.2 looks good. Any guesstimates >on when this will be coming?(!) Are there plans for 2.2 to be as easy to >apply as an upgrade as the 2.1.x releases have been?
Yes. Mailman 2.2 should be as easy to apply as 2.1.x upgrades. And I know I'll regret saying this, but 2.2 should be released in beta at least before the end of 2006, but the security changes I mentioned earlier in this thread won't be in the initial 2.2 release. >One further issue: Is it possible to discover who has been invited to join a >list but has not yet responded to the invitation email? bin/dumpdb lists/<listname>/pending.pck and look at entries with a code of 'S'. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
