Bretton Vine wrote: >Mark Sapiro said the following on 2006/09/15 04:42 PM: >> I don't know why your installations were not all upgraded to email >> 2.5.8 when you upgraded to 2.1.9, but they should have been. > >I'm just as puzzled ;-)
I think I have observed this happening in one way, but I'm not sure of the details. Possibly the tarball is unpacked recursively so that the unpack directory ends up containing misc/email-2.5.8/* instead of misc/email-2.5.8.tar.gz before 'make install' is run. This may cause the unpack/install of email-2.5.8 to fail leaving the old email library in pythonlib. Again, I'm not sure, but there also may be an issue if the tarball is unpacked into the old unpack directory so there is more than one version of the email library in misc/ in the unpack directory. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
