Please copy replies to the list. Bob Tschannen-Moran Wrote:
>Well, now that you put it THAT way, I have done more experimenting. When I >put in either of the following two header_filter_rules (from Spammers): > >Received: from [83.93.206.242] >helo=karin > >I do receive the admin notices, as one would expect. It's only when I put in >the following header-filter-rule > >X-EMWD-MailScanner: Not scanned > >That the admin notice fails to be sent. Crazy but true. Do you have any >ideas? What is the action for that rule? What happens to the post from you? Is it possible that post also has the X-EMWD... header? >PS -- We're using 2.1.9.cp1 See <http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq06.011.htp>. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
