At 6:30 PM -0500 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Of course, if machine 1 went down, all the messages in its hash > slices would sit unprocessed, but it would be a fairly simple matter > to reconfigure machine 2 to handle machine 1's slices, or to bring up > a fallback machine to handle those slices in the meantime.
Ahh, okay. Cool. I knew that there was a hashing scheme, but I had thought the intent was to use that for allowing multiple queue runners for each queue, on a single machine. I wasn't aware that the same mechanism would be used for splitting the queues across servers via NFS -- allowing you to avoid the locking problems I mentioned earlier. Cool. -- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trend Micro has announced that they will cancel the stop.mail-abuse.org mail forwarding service as of 15 November 2006. If you have an old e-mail account for me at this domain, please make sure you correct that with the current address. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
