Mark Sapiro napisaĆ(a): > Dominika Tkaczyk wrote: >> >>What if I did as you suggested first, but instead of one filter rule that >>matches everything, there would be one filter rule for each address I want >>held (I assume that there won't be more than 4-5 such subscribers), and such >>a rule would match a From: header with that address, and of course action >>would be Hold? > > > Yes, I think that would work. You could have a separate rule for each > poster or just one rule with a separate regexp for each poster.
Now I see, yes that will probably be a little simpler. I thought earlier that a rule has only one regexp. > In fact, you could then moderate everyone and set > default_member_moderation to Yes to simplify maintenance of moderation > because the header rule would apply to first hold the message and then > when the held message is approved, it wil bypass moderation. > > Note however that this wouldn't work if the header rule action was > accept because messages which are accepted by such a rule still go > through the additional checks. In this case, the posters would need to > have their moderate flags off. Thank you again for your help. Dominika ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp