Patrick Bogen wrote: >On 1/18/07, maillists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is it OK to keep Python my 2.2.? Am I headed for trouble at all? I >> still need a push to jump off this cliff. >You fool! You'll doom us all with your Python 2.2 foolishness! > > >Ahem. That said, I don't know of any problems with python 2.2, but >others may know better. >I guess this is a production box? Any chance you could build a test >box (vmware image?), install the newest mailman with python 2.2 on >that, and test it?
See the reply (to one of maillist's earlier posts) at <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-January/055395.html>. Also see <http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+2.1>. Mailman 2.1.9 et seq requires Python 2.3. In 2.1.9, the work-around is not too difficult, but it will only get worse. Mailman 2.2 will require Python 2.4. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
