On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:00:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Send Mailman-Users mailing list submissions to > mailman-users@python.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Mailman-Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Mailman web interface does not save changes (Brad Knowles) > 2. Re: content filtering problem (Rick Pasotto) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:29:35 -0500 > From: Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman web interface does not save > changes > To: Fernando Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > mailman-users@python.org > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > > At 11:03 AM -0300 4/9/07, Fernando Barros wrote: > > > I've search Mailman FAQ and find a related issue > > (http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=all#4.45) which points > > that the access to the site via redirect is tossing away the POST > > changes. The workaround would be to capture the POST data from the > > original request, convert it to a GET and redirect to that. > > > > Can anybody show me how to configure that ? > > You don't. You eliminate the redirect instead. > > See all the other FAQ entries and linked archive articles from the > mailman-users list. > > -- > Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Consultant & Author > LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu> > Slides from Invited Talks: <http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:11:05 -0400 > From: Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] content filtering problem > To: mailman-users@python.org > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:24:13PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > Rick Pasotto wrote: > > > > >Today I received a message that had been rejected by the content > > >filtering system and I'm not sure why. The sections of the message were: > > > > > > I 1 <no description> [text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 0.2K] > > > I 2 Toastmaster Meeting for Tmrw [message/rfc822, 7bit, 26K] > > > I 3 ><no description> [multipa/related, 7bit, 24K] > > > I 4 ><no description> [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.7K] > > > I 5 ><no description> [text/plain, quoted, us-ascii, 0.5K] > > > I 6 ><no description> [text/html, quoted, us-ascii, 2.9K] > > > I 7 >NewCiscoLogo.jpg [image/jpeg, base64, 20K] > > > > > >In the pass_mime_types I have: > > > > > >multipart/mixed > > >multipart/alternative > > >text/plain > > > > > >Was the message rejected because the text/plain was quoted? > > > > No. > > > > You have two problems. > > > > What is the overall message type in the main message headers? I suspect > > it was not multipart/mixed or multipart/alternative; possibly > > multipart/related or some such which would cause all of its sub-parts > > to be skipped because multipart/whatever is not accepted. > > I can see that I was insufficiently clear. What I posted above is the > sections of the reject message that Mailman sent me. The > 'message/rfc822' appears to be Mailman's encapsulation of the original > message. From your explanation I see that the problem was that the > original message was 'multipart/related'. > > > Further, even if the main message is multipart/mixed, you don't accept > > the message/rfc822 part so the only thing left would be the initial > > 0.2K text/plain part. > > > > You need to accept every multipart/ type that could possibly contain a > > sub-part of interest. A better choice for pass_mime_types is > > > > multipart > > message/rfc822 > > text/plain > > > > In your example above, this would pass all the multipart types > > regardless of sub-type as well as the message/rfc822 part. This > > doesn't mean the entire message will be passed. It just means that the > > various sub-parts of those parts will be examined and the text/plain > > parts accepted. > > > > Even though the above seems very liberal, it ultimately only accepts > > text/plain and elemental message/rfc822 parts, in this case only the > > two text/plain parts. > > Excellent. This is what I want. Thanks. > > -- > "Only one thing can conquer war - that attitude of mind which can see > nothing in war but destruction and annihilation" -- Ludwig von Mises > Rick Pasotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.niof.net > > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Mailman-Users mailing list > Mailman-Users@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users > Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py > Searchable Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ > > End of Mailman-Users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 18 > *********************************************
-- Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp