David R Bosso wrote: > >Rule 1 is (I thought) Match Return-Path:, only if it's not followed by >[EMAIL PROTECTED] This should discard for any Return Path but my email >address, did you modify it to match yours, or do I have the (?!...) syntax >wrong?
My mistake. I didn't really look at the Rule 1 pattern. The pattern is correct for what you want and it works. It didn't discard my test messages because my test setup uses Exim and Exim's pipe driver doesn't add a Return-Path: header, so rule 1 didn't match because there was no Return-Path: at all. I retested using bin/inject to deliver the messages. A message with Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: test was discarded by rule 1. A message with Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: test was held by rule 2, so I am still unable to duplicate the problem. What's in Mailman's vette log for the discarded message that should be held by rule 2? If that doesn't offer a clue, I suggest you get <http://mailman.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/mailman/branches/Release_2_1-maint/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/SpamDetect.py?revision=7750> and compare it to your Mailman/Handlers/SpamDetect.py to see if there is any difference. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp