Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >To be honest, that's exactly what "on behalf of" means, anyway, so I >don't understand why there's a problem here unless Outlook defaults to >reply-to-Sender rather than reply-to-From.
I've never used Outlook. I have no personal knowledge of this, but my impression is thae following: Mailman sends a post From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Outlook displays the message as From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is wrong. It would be more accurate if Outlook displayed Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I don't know if that would make much difference to the user. Also, it seems from what I see, that at least some Outlook clients do reply_to_Sender rather than reply-to-From which is a problem. Another problem is that some users get confused by "bounces" and think it means something is wrong. [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be more acceptable. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
