Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Digest members of the -discuss list will not receive the message unless
>> they are also members of the -announce list.
>
>I'd have to assume there's something internal that makes this necessary --
>I'm curious as to how much tweaking it would take to fix (i.e. make it so
>digest members receive the announcement, either in their digest or
>separately).
It is not any kind of internal requirement or convenience. It is a
design of the feature. The feature is intended to be used for parallel
discussion lists and it wouldn't be appropriate for digest members to
receive individual messages from a sibling discussion list.
To include digest members so they receive the announcement (separately;
not in the digest), you could locate the following lines at the end of
the definition of do_include at the very end of
Mailman/Handlers/CalcRecips.py
srecips = set([slist.getMemberCPAddress(m)
for m in slist.getRegularMemberKeys()
if slist.getDeliveryStatus(m) == ENABLED])
recips |= srecips
return list(recips)
and change getRegularMemberKeys() to getMembers() so the lines become
srecips = set([slist.getMemberCPAddress(m)
for m in slist.getMembers()
if slist.getDeliveryStatus(m) == ENABLED])
recips |= srecips
return list(recips)
Of course, this change would affect all lists with
regular_include_lists and might not be appropriate for other than the
-announce/-discuss scenario.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
