on 12/19/08 10:54 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull said:
Not entirely true. Many installations refuse to permit per-user rules. (If you run SA yourself, you can specify the config file, and therefore your own rules.)
Fair enough. Which leads me to what I've said before, which is that the only legitimate reason left for providing hooks for integrating tools like SpamAssassin or SpamBayes inside of Mailman itself, is for those people who don't have full control over their MTA.
It's still better to integrate tools like SpamAssassin and SpamBayes as early in the process as possible, but sometimes there are limits as to what is possible.
Now, in Lindsey's case, we're both members of a local Unix user group here in Austin, and I happen to know that he owns the entire machine. So, it's certainly possible for him to install SpamAssassin with the full user-level rules incorporated. Of course, that may be a non-trivial task, but it's still an option that is available to him.
-- Brad Knowles <b...@shub-internet.org> If you like Jazz/R&B guitar, check out LinkedIn Profile: my friend bigsbytracks on YouTube at <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu> http://preview.tinyurl.com/bigsbytracks ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
