On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > Thanks for clarifying, but it's still not clear. Do you mean the > list-ow...@domain.name address is subbed to the list, or the address to which > list-owner points is on the list?
Good point. LO in this case is just an address at another domain, on another box, past a different segment. > Are you saying that email explicitly > addressed to list-ow...@domain.name for the problem list doesn't make it > through to the referenced address(es), or just that _list traffic_ isn't > properly delivered to this address? Traffic from 1 of the 4 lists is no longer going to LO address. Likely coincidental, however, I would normally expect a user complaining of this to have bounces, which I see not for LO. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin_at_mfn.org 0xpgp_key_mgmt_is_broken-dont_bother "Never belong to any party, always oppose privileged classes and public plunderers, never lack sympathy with the poor, always remain devoted to the public welfare, never be satisfied with merely printing news, always be drastically independent, never be afraid to attack wrong, whether by predatory plutocracy or predatory poverty." Joseph Pulitzer 1907 Speech ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
