John Wesley Simpson Hibbs wrote: > >On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 08:36 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Is it only password reminders that you are seeing as unrecognized >> bounces? > >No... I've appended one that was not a password reminder to the end of this >post. > [...] > >I just now appended (per your advise) the following to mm_cfg.py: > > VERP_PASSWORD_REMINDERS = Yes > VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES = Yes > VERP_CONFIRMATIONS = Yes > >I then did "service mailman restart" and sent a test message through. >Still no +VERP in the list-boun...@.
I assume you also have VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL = 1 in mm_cfg.py. That's the important one. >This is rather annoying, especially since I went to a lot of trouble >getting qmail to deliver the list-bounces+VERP to mailman in the first >place, and things were working for quite a while... [...] >>Return-Path: <> >>Delivered-To: 9-list-boun...@example.net >>Date: 20 Dec 2008 22:11:56 -0000 >>From: mailer-dae...@subscriber.example.net >>To: list-boun...@example.net >>Subject: failure notice >>We're sorry. There's a problem with the e-mail address(es) you're >trying >>to send to. Please verify the address(es) and try again. If you continue >>to have problems, please contact Customer Support at (nnn) nnn-nnnn. >> >><someb...@subscriber.example.net>: >>child status 100...The e-mail message could not be delivered because >>the user's mailfolder is full. >> >>--- Below this line is a copy of the message. >> >>Return-Path: <list-boun...@example.net> >>Return-Path: <pos...@poster.example.net> >>Delivered-To: 9-l...@radiolists.net >>Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:11:34 -0500 >>From: "Poster" <pos...@poster.example.net> >>To: LIST <l...@example.net> >>Subject: [LIST] _________ >>X-BeenThere: l...@example.net >>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 >>Precedence: list >>Reply-To: LIST <l...@example.net> >>List-Id: LIST <list.example.net> >>Sender: list-boun...@example.net >>Errors-To: list-boun...@example.net When Mailman does the VERPing, not only the envelope sender (reflected as Return-Path:), but also the Sender: and Errors-To: headers are VERPd. Brad suggested in another reply that it is possibly some other, external MTA that is "unVERPing" the envelope. It seems unlikely that this is the case, both because it would also have to be "unVERPing" the Sender: and Errors-To:, and because I suspect that the qmail generated DSN above was generated by your own local qmail. So it looks like for some reason, Mailman is not VERPing. Assuming you do have VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL = 1 in mm_cfg.py, and it didn't somehow get lost, I don't know what would make Mailman behave this way. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
