Lindsay Haisley wrote: > >So, since Mailman is the "agent responsible for the actual transmission >of the message", re-writing the Sender header doesn't appear to be a >violation of the spec, but there is a problem here. It appears that >Mailman _should_ either offer the option of preserving the original >poster's Sender header, or should nuke the original poster's >DomainKey-Signature: header.
At one point, Mailman unconditionally removed DomainKey-Signature:, DKIM-Signature: and Authentication-Results: headers from outgoing mail. As a result of a discussion on Mailman-Developers [1], this behavior was made conditional based on the setting of REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS which defaults to No. If you want them removed, put REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS = Yes in mm_cfg.py. [1] <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2007-February/019346.html> et. seq. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
