David Newman wrote:
>
>Most messages make it into the archives but a few do not. I've pasted
>below a sample of a message that didn't make it to the archive. I
>suspect that it might be related to Postfix's message handling but am
>not sure what's missing from the offending messages.


The message below wasn't posted to the list. It is an off-list reply to
you only.


>((addresses, domains and IP addresses anonymized))
>
>Return-Path: <u...@example.com>
>X-Original-To: myn...@mydomain.tld
>Delivered-To: myn...@mydomain.tld
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by mail.mydomain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616F15B3159
>       for <myn...@mydomain.tld>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:21 -0800 (PST)
>X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localdomain
>X-Spam-Flag: NO
>X-Spam-Score: -1.671
>X-Spam-Level:
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.671 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
>       tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_20=-0.74, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
>Received: from mail.mydomain.tld ([127.0.0.1])
>       by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
>       with ESMTP id kkMkBnOO63bs for <myn...@mydomain.tld>;
>       Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:19 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from mx.otherdomain.net (blackhelicopters.otherdomain.net
>[666.1.2.3])
>       by mail.mydomain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDC15B3157
>       for <myn...@mydomain.tld>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:19 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from elvis.example.net (dsl1-2-3.yetanotherdomain.net [1.2.3.666])
>       (Authenticated sender: someu...@example.com)
>       by mx.otherdomain.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A02D196841
>       for <myn...@mydomain.tld>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:18 -0800 (PST)
>Message-Id: <23a25183-7f35-4d19-b528-53c0a6d4f...@example.com>
>From: someuser example <someu...@example.com>
>To: myname <myn...@mydomain.tld>
>In-Reply-To: <4969a68c.8000...@mydomain.tld>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
>Subject: Re: [myname members] Message size limits (was: (no subject))
>Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:17 -0800
>References: <0089fc87e3644d289559007671785...@wizardry>
><52f0a1b1f834c54db1c0cf32182d6e9b03d7b...@sagan.aperio.int>
><4969a68c.8000...@mydomain.tld>
>X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
>
>On Jan 10, 2009, at 11:58 AM, myname wrote:
>
>> With due respect, I think it's a lousy idea
>
>+1
>
>-someuser
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>Mailman-Users mailing list
>Mailman-Users@python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
>Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
>Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
>Unsubscribe: 
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/mark%40msapiro.net
>
>Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to