2009/5/8 Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>: > Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>For those patches, I don't see the need for any patch to Scrubber, >>since what I think your patch will do is encode the "Attachment >>Scrubbed" message with the encoding of the scrubbed attachment. I >>don't think that's either appropriate or what you want. The scrubbed >>attachment itself is decoded. > > > I withdraw the above comment. I didn't look closely enough at the > Scrubber patch. It does seem that the patch will make the encoding of > the flattened, scrubbed message equal to that of the first text/plain > part of the original message or None.
Yes that's exactly the idea. Scrubber already takes the charset and RFC3676 parameters from the first text/plain part, so I made the patch to take transfer-encoding from it as well. Without the patches, mailman always sets content-transfer-encoding of the flattened message according to Python's default (e.g. base64 for UTF-8). After patching it will preserve the sender's choice: QP / BASE64 / 8bit (None). Regards, Petr ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
