Removing mailman-developers because I'm not talking about implementation. Barry Warsaw writes:
> I've long thought that all archives should be vended dynamically > rather than statically, of course with a cache to improve performance > as necessary. I think it's a great option. But first Mailman would have to support archives, which it doesn't, really. pipermail is fine for small projects and some larger projects that are willing to put up with its limitations, but it's pretty creaky. Anything else (eg MHonArc) is "you do it yourself, see the tracker". IMO, trying to support archiving is mission creep the project should avoid, except for providing hooks to make it easier to use 3rd party archivers. N.B. That doesn't mean Barry and Mark shouldn't contribute to archivers, if they want to. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
