Barry Warsaw writes: > On Jun 29, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Grant Taylor wrote: > > > (Sorry, forgot to include this.) > > > > On 6/29/2009 8:10 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> If it's replying to message with a Precedence: header (and any > >> value) it's broken. > > > > You may want to take a look at section 3.9, "Quality information" of > > RFC 2076 (http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2076.txt). > > Sure, Precedence may be discouraged, but it's pretty common practice.
Amusingly enough, the most recent update of 2076 (see http://people.dsv.su.se/~jpalme/ietf/mail-headers/mail-headers.html) remarks that "more problems with Precedence" were added in its changes documentation. :-) ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
