Hi, Mark. On 1/4/10 9:38 AM, "Mark Sapiro" <m...@msapiro.net> wrote:
> But you probably don't need to mung the reply-to, at least for the > sublists. Assuming no reply-to munging at all, the original post will > always be From: the OP and To: the umbrella. Thus reply will go to the > OP and reply-all to the OP and the umbrella, just as for a > non-umbrella case. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? Most lists I either belong or have belonged to work the opposite way. Reply always sends to the list and Reply All goes to the list and OP. > If you want to mung a reply-to, munging the umbrella to reply-to the > umbrella should suffice as that reply-to will pass through the > sublists unchanged. > > The only place you have a problem is if the member's MUA offers list > reply based on the List-Post: header. This then may go to that > member's sublist only. The answer to this is to set > include_rfc2369_headers or at least include_list_post_header to No on > the sublists. Since I have no way of knowing these details for every subscriber (whether the subscriber's MUA offers reply based on the List-Post: header as you stated) would it cause any problems to make it standard procedure to set those commands to no as you suggested above ? Thank you for your help. Joe ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
