Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > >--On 17. Mai 2012 12:58:11 -0700 Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> wrote: > >>> I see that it's still calls itself 2.1.14. I hope I didn't miss >>> anything.. >> >> >> Where do you see it identify itself as 2.1.14? If properly installed, >> it should identify itself as 2.1.15rc1. > >Well, the web site still says 2.1.14 and I found this to explain it: > >mailman-2.1.15rc1]$ grep -r '2\.1\.14' * >Mailman/Version.py:VERSION =3D '2.1.14'
You are correct. Somehow I did something out of sequence when packaging the release. I will correct the tarballs. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
