I should also mention that this test was with DKIM signing and the number
of members was between 2100 and 2200.

Terry

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Terry Earley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Our own experience sending to 2100 users is that without personalization a
> message went out in 2 seconds. When we applied personalization and VERP,
> that test message went out in 120 seconds, which was acceptable to us.
>
> Obviously, there are many factors affecting speed of delivery.
> Personalization is just one. What you did was best. that is to test with
> your own environment.
>
> Terry Earley
>
> FitEyes
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Andrew Hodgson 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wondering how long in the real world it takes to get all messages
>> from a personalised list sent out and processed by the MTA on the same
>> machine as Mailman?  List is around 750 members.  I did run this once and
>> it took over 10 minutes to get all the messages delivered through the MTA,
>> I am partially wondering whether that is because I am DKIM signing each
>> message?  If I use standard delivery the processing time is a lot shorter
>> (around a minute).
>>
>> Just wondering,
>> Andrew.
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected]
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
>> Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
>> Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
>> Searchable Archives:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
>> Unsubscribe:
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/terry%40fiteyes.com
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to