On 6/17/13 10:58 AM, Jan Lausch wrote: > Dear Mark, >> should multiple messages from a single address be in separate, > time sorted boxes [...] > > Just my 2ct: keep it simple, no need to have many config options here: > Just keep the "one box per sender"-idea, but sort the boxes by the time of > the latest email from that sender. > > And thus replace the old sorting order: > "alphabetical" doesn't have any practical advantage (= someone missing the > way it worked yet) in my eyes. > > Use case "time-sorted" e.g.: find this one mail the user just sent a minute > ago in a queue full of SPAM. > > > jan I will say that for a list I run, I find the alphabetical ordering useful. I keep the last couple of months of notices normally sorted alphabetically by subject (which makes it ). Scanning through that list lets me see if someone has posted a number of similar messages and is starting to "spam" the list with them, and the order of this scan matches the order in the admin interface.
-- Richard Damon ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
