--On November 5, 2013 10:25:20 AM +0100 Ralf Hildebrandt
<ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
Who's to blame? Mailman for re-using the message-id? Exchange for
dropping the second mail on the floor?
The messages are duplicates, so they should have the same Message-ID.
Whether to suppress delivery of duplicates is the choice of an end user, or
a system administrator, or a software designer. I don't know which applies
to Exchange. But in order to allow the choice, which is correctly a choice
to be made at the receiving end, the dups have to be sent with the same
Message-ID.
I wouldn't say 'blame'.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University I T
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
