On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:29 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > first_strip_reply_to = Yes will remove all the incoming Reply-To: > addresses but will still add the poster's address to Reply-To: for all > three settings of reply_goes_to_list which respectively will result in > just the poster's address, the poster's address and the list posting > address or the poster's address and the explicit reply_to_address in the > outgoing Reply-To: header.
If first_strip_reply_to = No there are two possible situations which aren't covered in your (much improved!) self-doc. Either the original poster included a Reply-To:, or not. If not, then I assume the original From: address is put into the Reply-To: address. Yes? If the original poster included a Reply-To: address then DMARC forces us into a situation in which we can't avoid information loss. Either the poster's Reply-To: is overwritten with the original From:, or the original Reply-To: is retained and the original From: address is lost. Which is it? -- Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works if you let it" FMP Computer Services | 512-259-1190 | --- The Roadie http://www.fmp.com | ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
