What do you think of Yahoo Groups' From munging style and their
X-Original-From header?
Here is an example:
X-Original-From: Mark Rousell <ma...@signal100.com>
From: "Mark Rousell ma...@signal100.com [some-mail-list]"
<some-mail-l...@yahoogroups.com>
I feel this is one of the better combinations of munging and new
headers. All the information is there (and is very clear) and the
X-Original-From header could (in due course) be recognised by mail
clients and mailing list archive software.
I realise that this falls foul of
http://www.dmarc.org/supplemental/mailman-project-mlm-dmarc-reqs.html
and yet it does seem to offer many benefits, especially the
X-Original-From header and the promise it holds for automated recognition.
It is also possible to add X-Original-From to the .INVALID/.REMOVEME
munging that some prefer too:
X-Original-From: Mark Rousell <ma...@p-reject-domain.com>
From: "Mark Rousell [via some-mail-list]"
<ma...@p-reject-domain.com.REMOVEME>
Any thoughts?
--
Mark Rousell
PGP public key: http://www.signal100.com/markr/pgp
Key ID: C9C5C162
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
