>> Anything obviously wrong with this idea? > >It doesn't seem that the 'mover' should be checking the age of things in >queue 1. The idea is just to not send messages more than a few times a >day, not to introduce extra delay. > >Also, it's easy to configure Mailman to use some smtp port other than 25 >for sending and thus send only to to the first sendmail and be the only >thing that does so, but you may not want to delay all Mailman mail, e.g. >an on demand password reminder or a held message notification. The mover >needs to be smart. I think it should check queue1 frequently and if a >queued message has a Mailman generated Message-ID: of the form ><mailman\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+\..+@.+> move it right now, otherwise wait until >x hours since the last "bulk move" at which time it moves everything and >updates the last bulk move time. > >-- >Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, >San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Thanks Mark. Laura ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
