On 4/21/2015 1:38 PM, Danil Smirnov wrote:
Using 'service' scripts to control ALL server's services
[...]
Considering this 'packagers related' stuff as not important and insisting on 'native' way to use cron has less sense for me than the opposite. Why standard control of Mailman service in very popular distribution family has no reflection in Mailman documentation you mentioned and sometimes considers like 'artefacts'?
What 'service' scripts? On 4/21/2015 2:17 PM, Danil Smirnov wrote:
You described cron entries copying procedure as 'artifacts' - if init.d script supports fully the same functionality, I must agree that 'packager stuff' are really artifacts...
See, here's the thing- my systems don't have /etc/init.d/; I put the mailman startup in /etc/rc.local. (I use some very popular bsd distros, which are rather different from other *nix distros, which are rather different from other other *nix distros. It's a lot of work to keep track of all of them.) If the MM doc needs to be updated, I'm sure the offer would be well-received.
z! ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
