On 07/04/2015 10:19 AM, Steve Matzura wrote: > > Right. And it was wrong of RH not to tell me that up front, or if it > does, it didn't jump up and tell me. Sometimes there's just so much to > read and digest, and much of it has to be done after the fact. I'll > comb their docs and if it's not present, will let you know so somehow > it can be included somewhere.
Letting me know doesn't help. You have to tell RedHat. The documentation the GNU Mailman project produces documents our GNU Mailman distribution. If there is something incorrect or confusing in that documentation as applied to our distribution, then we want to know about it and we will do our best to fix it. We cannot however document or even know about everything that downstream packagers do in modifying and packaging our product in ways that make it no longer aligned with our documentation. That is the reason for the advice in the FAQ at <http://wiki.list.org/x/12812344> and the post linked therefrom. That's not to say that we won't try to help you if you have issues with a downstream package, but we are at a disadvantage for doing so. And, if you come here for help because we are more responsive and the packager is less so, perhaps you should reconsider your decision to use the downstream package. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
