On 05/27/2016 11:23 AM, Ryan Stasel wrote: > > Sorry, you’re right, while the lists are members, they’re all set to “nomail”.
Why are the list's members at all? > The list does have a couple individuals, but not many. They’re really only > there so they can send. But obviously I could put them in non-members. It's probably fine if they are members. > Nothing is in regular_exclude_lists. regular_include_lists is as I said, more > lists. A lot of individual emails is n accept_these_nonmembers. Basically > everyone that can send to the list. So, as long as you don't have things like @child_listname in the "everyone" list's accept_these_nonmembers, you can just remove the problem posters from that setting and their posts will then be handled according to generic_nonmember_action. They will still receive posts to "everyone" via their regular_include_lists membership and will still be able to post to their lists of which they are members, but not to the "everyone" list. > For the children, they have nothing set in regular_*_lists. OK -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org