On 07/12/2016 07:24 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <step...@xemacs.org> > wrote: >> is something you should look at before deciding to stay with a product >> after end-of-line. > > Doesn't this list traffic and interest prove that mm2x is nowhere near > end of life? I mean the interest is here, should that be actively > discouraged?
It depends on how you define "end of life". Granted there will be MM 2.1 lists in use for a very long time. There may still even be Mailman 2.0 lists in active use. The real question is not how long there will be users, but how long will Mailman 2.1 be actively supported and maintained, and whether it makes sense for new installations to use a package with little or no further development in sight vs. one with an active and growing development and support community. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
