On October 1, 2017 3:34:29 PM PDT, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> wrote: >On 10/01/2017 04:55 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> The log entries were written as Mailman did the subscribes and sent >the >> welcomes, but those subscriptions were lost when the process aborted >> before finishing. No more subscriptions are currently being done. > >So I don't get it, are you saying that is *was* aborted after the CGI >timed out?
Yes. >Or are you following on my "if something happens to interrupt it"? -- As I see it that's the same thing. The something that happened was the abort of the CGI. >it >was a hypothetical question about checkpointing and keeping state >during >long long-running tasks. Mailman 2.1 does no check pointing. There is no database in the usual sense. It does have a mechanism for backing up and recovering if delivery of a list message is interrupted, but that's it. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> Sent from my Not_an_iThing with standards compliant, open source software. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
