On 2017-10-01 22:23, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 9/29/2017 11:34 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
(mailman 2.1.12 on centos 6.9)
I don't think that Mark mentioned it, but 2.1.12 is -painfully- old (as
is centos 6.9) and centos packages often lag way behind the
corresponding source versions.
If you need to stick with 6.9, I would consider ditching the centos
package and installing the current mailman from source. Otherwise, can
you move to a more modern Linux and more recent mailman?
Mailman's been been trouble- and maintenance-free for us since we
switched from whatever-that-perl-thing-was-called all those years ago,
and it never occurred to me it'd something as silly as abort the running
op because my browser timed out. Now that I know, I'll consider
"upgrading" -- to the university-run lyris: I might as well outsource
the whole thing.
Dima
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
