On 10/17/2017 03:22 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Agreed, but the above imply NOT RFC 5322 compliant.
Please elaborate, if you're referring to more than From: vs Sent-By:.
In other words, an invalid DKIM signature SHOULD be treated no differently from no signature.
Fair enough. - I suspect DKIM by itself can tolerate that, like you are referencing.
I believe the problem is when DMARC is added to the mix, particularly with a policy of reject.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
