On 01/22/2018 04:55 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Its worse than that: what about people who intentionally set the Reply > To header on *non-mailing list* emails?
Then you won't get the "reply list" option in the first place. In the basic reply-to case, the mailer *should* -- as defined by modern RFCs -- honor the reply-to header. In the case of a mailing list my options are reply to list, reply to From:, reply to Reply-To:, or any combination thereof, and I fully expect the program to read both my and the original sender's minds and Do The Right Thing(tm) with a single click. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
