John Levine writes: > As I said a few messages ago, if lists did more stringent tests on > incoming mail, a lot of this complexity could be avoided,
I don't understand this. If lists got a pass, every spam would grow RFC 2369 header fields. No? So ISTM the received chain needs to be authenticated for the recipient to trust any last-hop sender, list or not. > but they don't so it can't. Origin checks are generally very useful and effective in my experience. But I don't see how authentication can be avoided. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
