On 3/26/19 12:36 AM, Jim Ziobro wrote:
You won't know how important until you start getting duplicate messages like RFC 1047 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1047>.
How would having a local MTA change the behavior in the face of a duplicate message?
I've seen symptoms of duplicate messages where multiple servers up stream are the source of duplication.
Are you implying that local MTA alters this behavior? Or that it provides additional tracing / diagnostic information?
I'm not aware of Mailman having any Message-ID deduplication functionality. Nor have I really seen it as a need.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
